Home › Recording Laws

Recording laws for lifeloggers: consent, state by state

A wearable recorder records other people. Before you wear one, know the one-party vs. all-party consent rules — and the etiquette that matters even where the law is on your side. This is general information, not legal advice.

The one rule that covers most of the country

Federal law (the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511) sets a one-party consent baseline: it is legal to record a conversation you are part of, because you are the one party consenting. Most states follow the same rule. If you wear a recorder and it captures conversations you're personally in, you're inside the one-party rule in most of the United States.

But a significant minority of states require all-party consent (often loosely called "two-party"): everyone in a private conversation must consent before it's recorded. Violations can be crimes and can support civil lawsuits. And one more thing lifeloggers forget: no state lets you record conversations you're not part of. A pendant that keeps rolling while you leave the room can cross into eavesdropping anywhere in the country.

All-party consent states (as commonly classified, 2026)

StateNotes for recorder wearers
CaliforniaAll-party for confidential communications; among the strictest, with civil damages available
DelawareAll-party under its privacy statutes
FloridaAll-party for private conversations
IllinoisAll-party for private conversations under its eavesdropping act
MarylandAll-party; applies to phone and in-person private conversations
MassachusettsBars secret recording — openly visible recording is treated differently than hidden devices
MontanaRequires notification of all parties, with exceptions
NevadaGenerally treated as all-party for phone calls under its case law
New HampshireAll-party for private conversations
PennsylvaniaAll-party under its wiretap act
WashingtonAll-party for private conversations; announcing the recording can satisfy the statute

Legal reference sites (Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Recording Law, Justia) commonly list these eleven; exact classification varies because statutes and case law differ. Always verify current law for your state — this page is general information, not legal advice.

The in-between states

  • Connecticut — mixed: one-party under criminal law for in-person conversations, but recording phone calls without all-party consent can create civil liability.
  • Oregon — flipped rules: in-person conversations generally require all-party consent (with exceptions, such as openly visible recording at some public gatherings), while phone/electronic communications follow one-party.
  • Michigan — the statute reads like all-party, but Michigan courts have generally allowed a participant in a conversation to record it; treat it cautiously.
  • Vermont — no recording statute; courts have handled disputes case by case, so the safe practice is to behave as if consent is required.

What this means when you wear a recorder

At home

Your household should affirmatively know and agree — not just tolerate. For families using a memory aid, that conversation is usually easy: the device exists to help someone remember, and everyone benefits from being able to ask what the plumber said. Houseguests deserve a heads-up; in all-party states they legally require one.

Out in public

Consent laws protect conversations where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Street noise and overheard chatter in a park generally aren't protected; a quiet booth conversation you join generally is. The gray zone is wide — which is why disclosure, not stealth, is the sustainable habit.

Phone calls and state lines

A call between a one-party state and an all-party state is the classic trap. Courts have applied the stricter state's law often enough that the practical rule is simple: follow the strictest state on the line. If anyone might be in California or Florida, get everyone's okay.

Work

Company meetings, other people's offices, and anything under an NDA are where recorder wearers get into real trouble. Many employers ban recording outright regardless of state law. Take the pendant off, or ask first — in writing.

Lifelogger etiquette that keeps friends

Common questions

Is it legal to record my own doctor's appointment?
In one-party states, generally yes, since you're part of the conversation. In all-party states you need the clinician's consent. Asking is the better path everywhere: it's respectful, most say yes for memory support, and some clinics will even help. Our communication guide has scripts families can borrow.
Does a pendant count differently than a phone?
The law mostly cares about consent and expectation of privacy, not the gadget. But a hidden or unnoticed device makes 'secret recording' arguments easier — Massachusetts, notably, targets secret recording specifically. Wearing the device visibly and disclosing it is both good law and good manners.
What about recording family members with dementia?
Consent gets legally and ethically complicated when someone's capacity is impaired. The widely-recommended practice: get consent early (while the person can meaningfully give it), involve whoever holds power of attorney, revisit the conversation often, and always honor distress or objection in the moment — whatever a document says.
Can I use my recordings in court?
Illegally-made recordings are generally inadmissible and can expose you to prosecution or suits. Even legal ones face evidentiary hurdles. If a dispute is why you're recording, talk to a lawyer first — that's a different project than lifelogging.

Privacy is the other half of this

Consent covers the people around you. Who controls the recordings afterward is a separate question — and after 2025's acquisitions, an urgent one.

Read the privacy guide Buyer's guide